This setting should typically only be used if you are reaching a CPU performance bottleneck during playback. Some encoders allow for encoding with an optional specified 'chunk' size to optimize for ultra high resolution video on a particular hardware system. HAP Q Alpha has improved image quality and an Alpha channel, at the expense of larger file sizes.HAP Q has improved image quality, at the expense of larger file sizes.HAP Alpha has the same image quality as HAP, and supports an Alpha channel.HAP has the lowest data-rate and reasonable image quality.There are four different flavors of HAP to choose from when encoding your clips. Choosing The Right Codec For The Job: HAP, HAP Alpha, HAP Q and HAP Q Alpha avi containers just like other video files you are used to working with. So freeware beats giant Adobe by far! But why? Am I doing something wrong? I still would like to use AME, because it is just more practical together with Premiere and AE, but under these circumstances it is not usable.Movies that are encoded with the HAP codecs are typically exported into standard. I have also tried giving AME a little higher bitrate (7 Mbps), still fractals there. Again, the resulting bitrate is about the same (AME 6200 kbps, FFMpeg 6400 kbps). the same bitrate using 1 pass and the quality factor, which is not available in AME.įFMpeg needs 3:22, that is 4.4 times faster!Īlso the FFMpeg version looks better, with AME I get fractals in noisy areas, which is not the case with FFMpeg. I also send the same to FFMpeg with appr. My System: AMD Ryzen 3900X, 64 GB RAM, RTX 2080Ti (Driver 442.19), Win 10 Pro (3), image sequence is stored on PCIE4-SSD. So I put it in a timeline in Premiere (2020, 14.0.1 Build 71) and send it to AME (14.0.1 Build 70) with the settings VBR, 1-pass, 6-8 Mbps, Maximum Render Quality on, AAC 48khZ 320 kbps, Renderer Mercury Playback Engine - GPU CUDA. I want to encode an image sequence (JPG, 1920x1080, 10.184 frames, 25fps) and an audio file (wav, 48kHz) to an H.264 AAC MP4.
0 kommentar(er)
